|
Поиск по сайту
Авторизация
|
GracevubДобавить объявление | Мои объявления
I am making a practice track for a dance class with spoken counts over generated instrumental backing. There is an audible buzz in the introduction near the cue for the first movement. The dancers need a dependable count-in and clear rhythmic markers more than a polished recording. I encountered <a href=https://removeaudioartifacts.top>remove suno artifacts</a> while researching the buzz, and I want to evaluate any processing against that practical requirement. Before testing a processed copy, I want to define what would actually make it more useful in class. Would a complete phrase following the spoken counts provide a useful test at ordinary class volume? I can keep the spoken layer identical so the backing track is the only part that changes. The check would include the downbeat and sharp rhythmic cues, rather than focusing only on the buzzing. What would count as an unacceptable loss of rhythmic clarity for this kind of practice track? Назад в раздел |